linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2007 06:48:20 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, j.blunck@...harburg.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> Unionfs patches.  The patches here represent several months of work and
> testing under various conditions, especially low-memory, SMP, and
> preemption situations with an assortment of lower systems: ext2/3/4, xfs,
> reiserfs, nfs, jffs2, ramfs, tmpfs, cramfs, and squashfs.

To increase test-usage, it may be critical to always backport at least to the 
latest stable release, like 2.6.22.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/