| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:16:39 +0200 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> Cc: davids@...master.com, "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> writes: >> Actually (and I think it's the same in the USA), a copyrighted work >> has an implicit "all rights reserved". A licence is just exception. > > And? The fact remains that "All Rights Reserved" means "I am reserving all > rights I do not specifically grant or waive". Sure. That means you can't use a work without obtaining a licence first (unless you are the copyright holder and don't need (can't have) the licence). I.e., as the author, you don't have to write those "copyright xxx" and the work is still protected. > ie: If a license doesn't > state 'The licenser hereby waives the right to revoke this license at any > time' then that right hasn't been lost. Yes, it hasn't been *lost*. It just never existed :-) (with exception of those things starting 40 or so years after the original publication, I think we can safely skip this part). Obviously, the copyright holder is free to distribute the work under a different licence next time (but (s)he has to make sure it's ok with licences (s)he uses, if it's a derived work). -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists