lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbp6a3$k6r$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date:	Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:33:44 +0200
From:	Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?

Hello,

I'm trying to write a UDEV rule, which has to hand over the SCSI device 
ID in the format $HOST:$CHANNEL:$ID:$LUN to a shellscript.

My first try was:

ATTR{vendor}=="XXXX", ATTR{model}=="XXXX", SUBSYSTEM=="scsi", 
ACTION=="add", PROGRAM+="/usr/bin/test.sh %b %p"

This returns the SCSI device ID and the device path up to the SCSI 
device to my test script.

As I would prefer to use the USB device information (idVendor, 
idProduct) to detect the device, I also tried this one:

ATTRS{idVendor}=="0dda", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2005", SUBSYSTEM=="scsi", 
ACTION=="add", PROGRAM+="/usr/bin/test.sh %b %p"

Now this version returns the USB device ID ($NUM-$NUM) to the test 
script, but the device path (%p) is still OK and still goes down up to 
the SCSI device ID.

Why does %b not return the SCSI device ID in the second rule?

Thanks in advance

Yours

Manuel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ