linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:28:05 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	travis@....com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, travis@....com wrote:
> Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map,
> whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access
> function has been defined.
>
> In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and ppc64 arch's to
> move the cpu_sibling_map from a static cpumask_t array [NR_CPUS] to
> be per_cpu cpumask_t arrays.
>
> Note that I do not have the ability to build or test patch 3/3, the
> ppc64 changes.
>
> Patches are referenced against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 .

It would be better if you could redo the patches with the original patches
reverted, not incremental changes. In the end we'll need a full patch set
with full changelog anyways, not a series of incremental fixes.

Also I guess some powerpc testers would be needed. Perhaps cc the
maintainers?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/