lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:21:42 -0400
From:	"Rob Hussey" <robjhussey@...il.com>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	efault@....de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

Hi all,

After posting some benchmarks involving cfs
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/13/385), I got some feedback, so I
decided to do a follow-up that'll hopefully fill in the gaps many
people wanted to see filled.

This time around I've done the benchmarks against 2.6.21, 2.6.22-ck1,
and 2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel (latest git as of 12 hours ago). All three
.configs are attached. The benchmarks consist of lat_ctx and
hackbench, both with a growing number of processes, as well as
pipe-test. All benchmarks were also run bound to a single core.

Since this time there are hundreds of lines of data, I'll post a
reasonable amount here and attach the data files. There are graphs
again this time, which I'll post links to as well as attach.

I'll start with some selected numbers, which are preceded by the
command used for the benchmark.

for((i=2; i < 201; i++)); do lat_ctx -s 0 $i; done:
(the left most column is the number of processes ($i))

	2.6.21		2.6.22-ck1	2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel

15	5.88		4.85		5.14
16	5.80		4.77		4.76
17	5.91		4.84		4.92
18	5.79		4.86		4.83
19	5.89		4.94		4.93
20	5.78		4.81		5.13
21	5.88		5.02		4.94
22	5.79		4.79		4.84
23	5.93		4.86		5.05
24	5.73		4.76		4.90
25	6.00		4.94		5.19

for((i=1; i < 100; i++)); do hackbench $i; done:

	2.6.21  	2.6.22-ck1	2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel

80	9.75		 8.95		 9.52
81	11.54		8.87		9.57
82	11.29		8.92		9.67
83	10.76		8.96		9.82
84	12.04		9.20		9.91
85	11.74		9.39		10.09
86	12.01		9.37		10.18
87	11.39		9.43		10.13
88	12.48		9.60		10.38
89	11.85		9.77		10.52
90	13.78		9.76		10.65

pipe-test:
(the left most column is the run #)

	2.6.21	2.6.22-ck1	2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel

1	13.84	12.59		13.01
2	13.90 	12.57 		13.00
3	13.84 	12.62 		13.06
4	13.87 	12.61 		13.04
5	13.82 	12.62 		13.03
6	13.86 	12.60 		13.02
7	13.85 	12.61 		13.02
8 	13.88 	12.45 		13.04
9	13.83 	12.46 		13.03
10	13.88 	12.46 		13.03

Bound to Single core:

for((i=2; i < 201; i++)); do lat_ctx -s 0 $i; done:

		2.6.21		2.6.22-ck1	2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel

15		2.90		2.76		2.21
16		2.88		2.79		2.36
17		2.87		2.77		2.52
18		2.86		2.78		2.66
19		2.89		2.72		2.81
20		2.87		2.72		2.95
21		2.86		2.69		3.10
22		2.88		2.72		3.26
23		2.86		2.71		3.39
24		2.84		2.72		3.56
25		2.82		2.73		3.72


for((i=1; i < 100; i++)); do hackbench $i; done:

		2.6.21		2.6.22-ck1	2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel

80		14.29		10.86		12.03
81		14.40		11.25		12.17
82		15.00		11.42		12.33
83		14.87		11.12		12.51
84		15.37		11.42		12.66
85		15.75		11.68		12.79
86		15.64		11.95		12.95
87		15.80		11.64		13.12
88		15.70		11.91		13.25
89		15.10		12.19		13.42
90		16.24		12.53		13.54

pipe-test:

	2.6.21	2.6.22-ck1	2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel

1  	9.27	8.50 		8.55
2  	9.27	8.47 		8.55
3  	9.28	8.47 		8.54
4  	9.28	8.48 		8.54
5  	9.28	8.48 		8.54
6  	9.29	8.46 		8.54
7  	9.28	8.47 		8.55
8  	9.29	8.47 		8.55
9  	9.29	8.45 		8.54
10 	9.28	8.46 		8.54

Links to the graphs (the .dat files are in the same directory):
http://www.healthcarelinen.com/misc/benchmarks/lat_ctx_benchmark2.png
http://www.healthcarelinen.com/misc/benchmarks/hackbench_benchmark2.png
http://www.healthcarelinen.com/misc/benchmarks/pipe-test_benchmark2.png
http://www.healthcarelinen.com/misc/benchmarks/BOUND_lat_ctx_benchmark2.png
http://www.healthcarelinen.com/misc/benchmarks/BOUND_hackbench_benchmark2.png
http://www.healthcarelinen.com/misc/benchmarks/BOUND_pipe-test_benchmark2.png

The only analysis I'll offer is that both sd and cfs are improvements,
and I'm glad that there is a lot of work being done in this area of
linux development. Much respect to Con Kolivas, Ingo Molnar, and Roman
Zippel, as well all the others who have contributed.

Any feedback is welcome.

Regards,
Rob

Download attachment "BOUND_hackbench_benchmark2.png" of type "image/png" (6271 bytes)

Download attachment "BOUND_lat_ctx_benchmark2.png" of type "image/png" (8408 bytes)

Download attachment "BOUND_pipe-test_benchmark2.png" of type "image/png" (3386 bytes)

Download attachment "hackbench_benchmark2.png" of type "image/png" (5844 bytes)

Download attachment "lat_ctx_benchmark2.png" of type "image/png" (8881 bytes)

Download attachment "pipe-test_benchmark2.png" of type "image/png" (3738 bytes)

Download attachment "data_files.tar.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip2" (5994 bytes)

Download attachment "config-2.6.21.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip2" (8395 bytes)

Download attachment "config-2.6.22-ck1.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip2" (8358 bytes)

Download attachment "config-2.6.23-rc6-cfs-devel.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip2" (8000 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ