lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:46:21 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
CC:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Folkert van Heusden <folkert@...heusden.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] SCSI: split Kconfig menu into two

Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>  SCSI is a generic peripheral bus

No, not anymore.  http://www.t10.org/scsi-3.htm

> (recall the expansion of the acronym).

The expansion of the acronym doesn't fit anymore to what SCSI is today,
or even to what it became already circa 10 years ago.

> Even though probably the most common, storage is one of its applications 
> only (think scanners for an immediately obvious other one).  I find 
> describing CONFIG_SCSI as "storage support" misleading and inappropriate.

Right.  I wrote that in lack of better words, but at least I added "SCSI
commands" in parentheses.  Something like "SCSI I/O - core and command
sets" would much better describe what it is, but it would put "SCSI"
first again and thus wouldn't reflect that  Linux' SCSI core and
highlevel is in broader use than just for actual SCSI hardware...  Of
course there is no way around the issue that Linux' SCSI core's and
highlevel's role cannot be characterized in 3...6 words only, but there
should be a way to point out its general importance.

>  Referring to your example it is like calling generic networking (i.e. 
> CONFIG_NET) "Ethernet support".

Wrong comparison.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =--= =---=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ