linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:46:40 +0530 (IST)
From:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@...oo.de>
cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1

Hi Borislav,


On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:01:21PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > >> +#define DMA_64BIT_MASK	DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> > >>     
> > >
> > > This one does not do what you mean. You need an explicit mask or a
> > > ~0ULL here.
> > 
> > Yeah, I was just about to comment on it.  Its possible the compiler
> > might decide to shift by x%64 = 0.
> > 
> >     J
> ups, i knew that this might be a corner/boundary case. Thanks, updated patches
> follow...

Please fold all three patches into a single patch in the updated series,
otherwise git bisecters falling in between these patches will see the
"redefinition ... previous definition was here" warnings of gcc ...


Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/