linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on Toshiba Satellite A40

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:17:50 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maciek Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on Toshiba Satellite A40

On Thursday 20 September 2007, you wrote:
> Please try this patch.

Works. All states are now listed again.
I've not tested suspend to disk, but suspend to ram and power off work fine.

> +printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "(supports");
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> -       printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "(supports");
>         for (i = ACPI_STATE_S0; i < ACPI_STATE_S4; i++) {

Isn't there a risk now that we now end up printing
   ACPI: (supports)
if CONFIG_SUSPEND is not enabled and >S4 is not supported?

Or, more probably, it would print
   ACPI: (supports S5)
as it is unlikely that "off" is not supported :-)

Maybe S0 should be taken outside the #ifdef and the loop as that state is 
also basically always there?

Thanks,
FJP
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/