linux-kernel - Re: question on kernel rwsem behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:11:22 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question on kernel rwsem behaviour

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:38:44 -0600 "Chris Friesen"
<cfriesen@...tel.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just had a quick question on read-write semaphore semantics.  Suppose 
> someone holds a sema for reading, then someone else tries to aquire it 
> for writing, and blocks.  Finally, a third code path tries to aquire it 
> for reading.
> 
> Does this third code path get the sema, or does it wait for the writer?
> 
> Based on looking at the implementation it seems like it waits, but I'd 
> like to confirm that.

Yes, its fair in that sense.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/