linux-kernel - Re: [patch 7/7] Add documentation for extended crashkernel syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:06:13 +0200
From:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] Add documentation for extended crashkernel syntax

* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> [2007-09-18 19:21]:
> > This adds the documentation for the extended crashkernel syntax into
> > Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt.
> 
> Should you also update kernel-parameters.txt?

Ok, I'll do.

> > +For example:
> > +
> > +    crashkernel=512M-2G:64M,2G-:128M
> > +
> > +This would mean:
> > +
> > +    1) if the RAM is smaller than 512M, then don't reserve anything
> > +       (this is the "rescue" case)
> > +    2) if the RAM size is between 512M and 2G, then reserve 64M
> > +    3) if the RAM size is larger than 2G, then reserve 128M
> 
> Why is this useful? I mean... if 64M is enough to save a dump, why use
> 128M? ...or does the required size somehow scale with memory in
> machine? (pagetables?)

A bit, yes (ELF core headers, DISCONT memory, per-CPU data), but
consider also that saving may be faster if you have more RAM (e.g.
saving over SSH, encryption, ...).


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/