lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:52:32 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, hpa@...or.com, ego@...ibm.com, oleg@...sign.ru, patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [35/50] i386: Do cpuid_device_create() in CPU_UP_PREPARE instead of CPU_ONLINE. On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 10:52 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > > > arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c > > > +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c > > > @@ -136,15 +136,18 @@ static const struct file_operations cpui > > > .open = cpuid_open, > > > }; > > > > > > -static int __cpuinit cpuid_device_create(int i) > > > +static int cpuid_device_create(int cpu) > > > > __cpuinit please > > > > Yes. This eliminates earlier patch in this series. > ([22/50] i386: Misc cpuinit annotation) No, it's even worse: #22 is applied before #35. #35 is reverting the __cpuinit anotation of #22 with its modificiations of cpuid_device_create() tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists