linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:25:01 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:	linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:26 -0700 Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> +#define QOS_RESERVED 0
> +#define QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY 2
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT 3
> +
> +#define QOS_NUM_CLASSES 4
> +#define QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE -1
> +
> +int qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value);
> +int qos_update_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 new_value);
> +void qos_remove_requirement(int qos, char *name);

It's a bit rude stealing the entire "qos" namespace like this - there are
many different forms of QoS, some already in-kernel.

s/qos/pm_qos/g ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/