linux-kernel - Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:36:24 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mpm@...enic.com, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, apw@...dowen.org,
	"Lee.Schermerhorn@...com" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:18:09 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > How come?  Memoryless node can and do occur in real-world machines.  Kernel
> > > should support that?
> > 
> > But a node is just defined by its memory? 
> 
> Don't think so.  A node is a lump of circuitry which can have zero or more
> CPUs, IO and memory.
> 
> It may initially have been conceived as a memory-only concept in the Linux
> kernel, but that doesn't fully map onto reality (does it?)
> 
> There was a real-world need for this, I think from the Fujitsu guys.  That
> should be spelled out in the changelog but isn't.

Yes, Fujitsu and HP guys really need this memory-less-node support. 

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/