linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:35:17 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	menage@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com,
	cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets


* Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:

> There might be an even simpler way.  If the kernel/sched.c routines 
> detach_destroy_domains() and build_sched_domains() were exposed as 
> external routines, then the cpuset code could call them directly, 
> removing the partition_sched_domains() routine from sched.c entirely. 
> Would this be worth persuing?

in any case i'd like to see the externally visible API get in foremost - 
and there now seems to be agreement about that. (yay!) Any internal 
shaping of APIs can be done flexibly between cpusets and the scheduler.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/