linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:42:16 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC:	ak@...e.de, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:34:13 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
>>> would save others the trouble.
>>>
>>> Some of these are "best guess" based on a quick scan of the code, so it
>>> certainly needs a sanity review before going upstream.
>>
>> "iommu" is listed in Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt
>> along with more x86_64-specific boot options.
>> A few other arches do something similar...
> 
> Ah!  Well, seeing as how we already have a provision for arch-specific 
> options in kernel-parameters.txt, and some less-obscure arch-specific 
> options can be found there, I think an argument can be made for my patch :)
> 
> Nonethless, if the maintainer disagrees, they can drop this patch I 
> suppose.

or maybe during the x86 merge, we can merge the docs also...

-- 
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/