linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:54:17 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL
 pids

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:20:43PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Just make the __pid_nr() etc functions that expect the argument
>> to always be not NULL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
> 
>>  static inline pid_t pid_nr(struct pid *pid)
>>  {
>>  	pid_t nr = 0;
>>  	if (pid)
>> -		nr = pid->numbers[0].nr;
>> +		nr = __pid_nr(pid);
>>  	return nr;
>>  }
> 
> Is there a patch that removes these inlines? Otherwise this looks good
> to me.

Not yet. Some of are uninlined already, but others are not. I'd like 
to make some testing before uninline them.

> --
> Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/