linux-kernel - Re: [NFS] What's slated for inclusion in 2.6.24-rc1 from the NFS client git tree...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
	Peter Staubach <staubach@...hat.com>
Cc:	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NFS] What's slated for inclusion in 2.6.24-rc1 from the NFS
	client git tree...

On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:41:16 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > We also have the 64-bit inode support from RedHat/Peter Staubach.
> > 
> 
> As has been pointed[1] out[2], this will cause regressions for non-LFS
> applications (of which there are still lots and lots). This change
> should be in feature-removal (the "feature" being removed is legacy
> support for non-LFS applications using NFS servers that make full use
> of the protocol) and preferably accompanied with appropriate user space
> changes (e.g. compatibility option in glibc).
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241348
> [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=118701088726477&w=2
> 
> Rgds

How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off?

I don't see any point in having a sysctl for something like this: either
you have legacy applications or you don't. It is not something that you
switch off as you go off to lunch.
A compile parameter, OTOH, would be too restrictive since it would force
distros to choose just one behaviour (which would mean they would have
to choose the most conservative).

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/