lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 7 Oct 2007 01:44:26 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] compat_ioctl: move common block ioctls to compat_blkdev_ioctl

On Saturday 06 October 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static int compat_put_u64(unsigned long arg, u64 val)
> > +{
> > +     return put_user(val, (compat_u64 __user *)compat_ptr(arg));
> > +}
> 
> These should probably be in compat.h

Hmm, I'm not sure. They are modeled after the put_{short,int,uint,...}
functions that only exist in block/ioctl.c and I put them in so I
could use almost identical code in the native and compat path.

If we find these generally useful, I guess we could have both
versions of each of these functions in global headers, e.g. in
linux/uaccess.h and linux/compat.h, but right now I would recommend
using plain put_user in all compat code except for block ioctl.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ