linux-kernel - Re: OHCI root_port_reset() deadly loop...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greg@...ah.com
Cc:	david-b@...bell.net, linux-usb-users@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OHCI root_port_reset() deadly loop...

From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:10:49 -0700

> Yes it does, I'm seeing reports from some hardware companies of the very
> same thing.  If you serialize and load the ehci driver first, and then
> the ohci driver, that should fix the problem.
> 
> Does that also work for you?  Or are these drivers built into the
> kernel?

As coicidence would have it I finally found a recipe for triggering
the issue, and it ties into what you're talking about here.

It happens only if I make sure OHCI gets loaded first and then EHCI
right afterwards.

It seems that indeed it is important for EHCI to get loaded first,
and in-kernel this is ensured by the link ordering.

However, when both OHCI and EHCI are built as modules (or, similarly
I guess, OHCI is built-in and EHCI is modular) there appears to be
nothing in userspace which makes sure EHCI gets loaded first.

When this triggers, in OHCI's root_port_reset(), the port status
register reads 0x111 in that inner-loop and the value never changes.
It stays like this forever.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/