linux-kernel - Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:57:00 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD

Krzysztof Halasa wrote:

> There is no such thing as bit-order.

Yes, there is.  You need to read the article at 
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6788.  Explains what it means for bits to 
be in one order versus another.  This is from the perspective of external 
devices, not the CPU (which is always consistent with regards to bit order)


-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/