[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:53:40 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 16:40 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
<snip>
> ====
> Subject: Use specified node ID with GFP_THISNODE if available
>
> It had been assumed that __GFP_THISNODE meant allocating from the local
> node and only the local node. However, users of alloc_pages_node() may also
> specify GFP_THISNODE. In this case, only the specified node should be used.
> This patch will allocate pages only from the requested node when GFP_THISNODE
> is used with alloc_pages_node().
>
> [nacc@...ibm.com: Detailed analysis of problem]
> Found-by: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
>
<snip>
Mel: I applied this patch [to your v8 series--the most recent, I
think?] and it does fix the problem. However, now I'm tripping over
this warning in __alloc_pages_nodemask:
/* Specifying both __GFP_THISNODE and nodemask is stupid. Warn user */
WARN_ON(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE);
for each huge page allocated. Rather slow as my console is a virtual
serial line and the warning includes the stack traceback.
I think we want to just drop this warning, but maybe you have a tighter
condition that you want to warn about?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists