linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:09:30 +0100
From:	mel@...net.ie (Mel Gorman)
To:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

On (10/10/07 11:53), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce:
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 16:40 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> <snip>
> > ====
> > Subject: Use specified node ID with GFP_THISNODE if available
> > 
> > It had been assumed that __GFP_THISNODE meant allocating from the local
> > node and only the local node. However, users of alloc_pages_node() may also
> > specify GFP_THISNODE. In this case, only the specified node should be used.
> > This patch will allocate pages only from the requested node when GFP_THISNODE
> > is used with alloc_pages_node().
> > 
> > [nacc@...ibm.com: Detailed analysis of problem]
> > Found-by: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> > 
> <snip>
> 
> Mel:  I applied this patch [to your v8 series--the most recent, I
> think?] and it does fix the problem.  However, now I'm tripping over
> this warning in __alloc_pages_nodemask:
> 
> 	/* Specifying both __GFP_THISNODE and nodemask is stupid. Warn user */
> 	WARN_ON(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE);
> 
> for each huge page allocated.  Rather slow as my console is a virtual
> serial line and the warning includes the stack traceback.
> 
> I think we want to just drop this warning, but maybe you have a tighter
> condition that you want to warn about?
> 

I should drop the warning. The nature of the comment and the WARN_ON was
rooted in my belief that "THISNODE means this node I am running on" and the
warning was defensive programming just in case the assumption was broken. Now
we know the assumption was wrong and the warning is bogus.

Thanks Lee.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/