lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:15:38 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [matthew@....cx: Re: [parisc-linux] parisc arch makefile clean-up needed [Was: cleaning up "make headers_install" for various architectures]]


Sam mipslet 'parisc-linux' in the first mail ... so i replied to the
second mail ... without checking l-k was still cc'd.

----- Forwarded message from Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> -----

From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: parisc-linux@...ts.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] parisc arch makefile clean-up needed [Was:
	cleaning up "make headers_install" for various architectures]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:42:25PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> parisc arch Makefile needs some love and care...
> 
> The logic selecting CROSS_COMPILE seems fishy and wrong -
> the error reported by rday is obvious in this respect.

He doesn't have a compiler installed that can target parisc.  It doesn't
seem obvious to me that this should work.

> FINAL_LD is unused - kill it.

OK.

> Building with oldpalo has been broken for a loong time - time to kill it?
> Hint - the "cd ../palo" is not working as expected.
> And use of TOPDIR is deprecated.

OK, killed.  I don't think anyone still uses that.

> The libs-y assignment should learn from the other architectures how to
> get the gcc lib filename:
> $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)

Actually, this looks utterly unstandardised:

arch/cris/Makefile:LIBGCC = $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-file-name=libgcc.a)
arch/h8300/Makefile:LIBGCC := $(shell $(CROSS-COMPILE)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)
arch/m32r/Makefile:LIBGCC       := $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)
arch/parisc/Makefile:libs-y     += arch/parisc/lib/ `$(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name`
arch/sh64/Makefile:LIBGCC := $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)
arch/sh/Makefile:LIBGCC := $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)
arch/xtensa/Makefile:LIBGCC := $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)

How about we set it in the main Makefile, or one of the ones in
scripts/?  That way we don't have to learn why $(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS)
-print-libgcc-file-name) is superior to `$(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name`

> 
> And this snippet is also wrong:
> PALO := $(shell if which palo; then : ; \
> 	elif [ -x /sbin/palo ]; then echo /sbin/palo; \
> 	fi)
> 
> palo: vmlinux
> 	@if [ -x $PALO ]; then \
> 
> 
> Make does not export variables so $PALO is not the same as $(PALO).
> The latter should be used.

Huh.  Looks like the sense of the test is reversed too.  That should
probably be:

	@if [ ! -x $(PALO) ]; then \

> I did not supply a patch because I do not fully understand the
> logic behind setting CROSS_COMPILE and 64BIT or not.
> But I will be happy to review a patch to fix the issues in the
> parisc Makefile.

One issue is that we don't have native 64-bit userspace on parisc.
And we don't have a toolchain that you can pass -m32/-m64 to; you have
to explicitly build a hppa64-linux-gnu toolchain.  Another thing we try
and make user-friendly is that if you're building the parisc kernel on
a non-parisc machine, you need to use a cross-compiler, so we autodetect
that case for you.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@...ts.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ