[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:26:41 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus et al.,
>>
>> 2.6.23 does not build with my usual .config on x86_64 and gcc-4.2.1:
[]
> your superblock build failure would be a new and so far unknown build
> breakage variant - please send the .config you used, and double-check
> that it's indeed a vanilla 2.6.23 tree.
It's not a vanilla 2.6.23. In vanilla 2.6.23 there's no lines about
which it complains (struct super_block isn't mentioned in mm.h at all).
It's some external patch that used to work with 2.6.22 but needs to be
updated for 2.6.23 - in my case it was unionfs.
/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists