[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@...oo.com>
To: James.Smart@...lex.Com, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexis Bruemmer <alexisb@...ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic94xx: Use request_firmware() to provide SAS address if the adapter lacks one
--- James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com> wrote:
> Here's one pro for setting WWNs at arbitrary times...
> If the box is migrating applications (say containers) that want
> different SAN connectivity, where that connectivity (view) is based
> on their WWN, it would be really nice to selectively set the WWN and
> not touch the SAN config.
No. The WWN stays the same and the SAN is re-configured to be
aware of the node migration. Access patterns could be more
complex than just a single portal allowing access to/from the
SAN from/to the node.
WWN is supposed to be persistent. This is what it actually is.
It is NOT supposed to be "(auto)generated" and/or changed at a whim.
This also has security implications, and enterprise networks may
refuse to use software (read "kernel") which allows for arbitrary
changes to a node's WWN.
If access to a node is compromised, a rogue agent may change
the node's WWN in order to access SAN zones that it normally
will be denied access to.
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists