linux-kernel - Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:44:22 -0700
From:	Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption

On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:41:17AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:31:51PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> >> you most certainly want to do this in userspace I think.
> >>
> >> One of the biggest problems is that link negotiation can take a significant amount
> >> of time, well over several seconds (1 to 3 seconds typical) with gigabit, and
> >> having your ethernet connection go offline for 3 seconds may not be the desired
> >> effect for when you want to get more bandwidth in the first place.
> >>
> >> However, when a laptop is in battery mode, switching down from gigabit to 100mbit
> >> makes a lot more sense, so this is something I would recommend. This can be as
> >> easy as changing the advertisement mask of the interface and renegotiating the
> >> link. Userspace could handle that very easily.
> > 
> > Now if you were trying to transfer a lot of data to the laptop, would it
> > be more power efficient to do it at gigabit speeds so you can finish
> > sooner and shut down the machine entirely, or to slow to 100mbit and
> > take longer to do it, and hence spend more time powering the cpu and
> > ram?
> 
> my suspicion is that the cost of switching is much higher than what you would
> consume running at 100mbit, even if the amount of data is quite large. going
> offline to renegotiate the link would already cost you 3W typically.
> 
> I definately think that userspace is the right field to solve this problem: let
> the users decide how to use the available power on their sytems through a decent
> power profile tool (perhaps gnome-power-manager or something like that). This way
> the user can choose.
> 

Auke, 
I was wondering if we could use PM-QOS to have the driver drop to the
100Mb speed, when requests for bandwidth and latency are not in effect?

--mgross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/