linux-kernel - Re: What still uses the block layer?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:44:37 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>,
	Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
	Nick Piggin <piggin@...erone.com.au>
Subject: Re: What still uses the block layer?

Alan Cox wrote:
>> You can pull a Model and Serial number via hdparm -i, but it's not as
>> easy to manipulate as a fixed-length MAC address.  That's why people
>> tend to use filesystem UUID's.   
> 
> ATA8 at the moment looks set to add a true "MAC" or "WWN" type identifier
> to each device.. Right now model/serial is not always unique.

WWN was added in ATA-7, AFAICS.

However, I've seen quite a few ATA-7 devices that do not bother to fill 
it in.  I wonder if ATA-8 device firmwares will act with similar 
slackness.  :)

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/