linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:47:41 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	ego@...ibm.com
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Implementation

On Tuesday 16 October 2007 20:34:17 Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> This patch implements a Refcount + Waitqueue based model for
> cpu-hotplug.

Hi Gautham,

	I can't see where you re-initialize the completion.  

> +static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> +	cpu_hotplug.active_writer = current;
> +	while (cpu_hotplug.refcount) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> +		wait_for_completion(&cpu_hotplug.readers_done);
> +		mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> +	}

AFAICT this will busy-wait on the second CPU hotplug.

Cheers,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/