linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Shadow directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:09:06 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
cc:	jaroslav.sykora@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Shadow directories

On Oct 19 2007 05:32, David Newall wrote:
>
> The claim is wrong.  UNIX systems have traditionally allowed the
> superuser to create hard links to directories.  See link(2) for
> 2.10BSD
> <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=link&sektion=2&manpath=2.10+BSD>.
> Having got that wrong throws doubt on the argument; perhaps a path
> can simultaneously be a file and a directory.

But hell will break lose if you allow hardlinking directories.

mkdir /tmp/a
ln /tmp/a /tmp/a/b

And you would not be able to rmdir /tmp/a/b because the directory is
not empty (it contains "b" [full path: /tmp/a/b/b]).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/