lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:12:03 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: latest checkpatch

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:
> 
> > > it's perfectly legitimate, in fact more robust. So if checkpatch.pl 
> > > wants to make any noise about such constructs it should warn about 
> > > the _lack_ of curly braces in every multi-line condition block 
> > > _except_ the only safe single-line statement:
> > > 
> > > 	if (x)
> > > 		y();
> > 
> > Indeed.  We should probabally do more on the indentation checks in
> > general.  The current direct check for:
> > 
> > 	if (foo);
> > 		bar();
> > 
> > Could probabally be generalised to look for this kind of error:
> > 
> > 	if (foo)
> > 		bar();
> > 		baz();
> > 	one();
> 
> detecting that would be awesome - it's often the sign of a real bug 
> because the intent is often to have bar() and baz() in the conditional 
> block.

Should probably detect these as well (if not yet being done):

	if (abc)
#if...
		def();
		ghi();
#e...


...plus this one:

	if (abc)
#if...
		def();
#endif
	ghi();

...Both of them are clearly bugs.

...and this where either indentation has to be fixed or the bug corrected:

	if (abc)
	def();


-- 
 i.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ