lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:05:59 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86: fix global_flush_tlb() bug


Thanks for catching. 

> why this bug never become prominent is a mystery - it can probably be
> explained with the (still) relative obscurity of the x86_64 architecture.

global_flush_tlb() is not very common in the big scheme of things. In a normal
system it only happens single threaded during X server startup and when
the system starts.

So while it's nasty it's unlikely to really hit people in practice.

BTW while looking I noticed this code in the vermilion driver is also
surely not correct:

        /*
         * Change caching policy of the linear kernel map to avoid
         * mapping type conflicts with user-space mappings.
         * The first global_flush_tlb() is really only there to do a global
         * wbinvd().
         */

        global_flush_tlb();

That is not what gft is guaranteed to do.

It would be probably best to just do away with g_f_t() and fold it directly into
c_p_a(). I've seen little evidence the delayed flush optimization ever made 
much difference and it seems to be misused and a source of bugs. And near all
legitimate users seem to always call it directly after c_p_a() anyways.

Besides it is grossly misnamed -- it does much more than flushing TLBs.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ