linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:42:33 +0100
From:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@...il.com>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following:
> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;(
>
> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here:
> 	http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt

It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results
I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying
ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying
to build another.

Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree?

(FWIW I get a coredump if I try to use the skas patch, but with noprocmm
UML in 2.6.23.1 builds and runs perfectly well on x86-32. I haven't
tried 2.6.23, but I see no reason why it should act any differently.)

-- 
`Some people don't think performance issues are "real bugs", and I think 
such people shouldn't be allowed to program.' --- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/