linux-kernel - Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:54:38 +0200
From:	Samuel Tardieu <sam@...1149.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?

>>>>> "Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <sam@...1149.net> writes:
>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> writes:

Nick> Either way, I think we really need a way to turn it off for
Nick> Linux.

Sam> Someone would need to add an option to disable the "cselim" pass
Sam> in GCC tree-ssa-phiopt.c as far as I can tell from reading GCC
Sam> source.

Mmm, it looks like there is an option already (-fno-tree-cselim), but
it looks like it has no visible effect in my version of GCC
(yesterday's SVN). I'll ask on the GCC mailing-list.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@...1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/