linux-kernel - Re: IRQ off latency of printk is very high

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:57:18 +0200
From:	Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: IRQ off latency of printk is very high

>>>>> "MM" == Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> writes:

MM> Well there are things we can do, yes, but I'd be worried that
MM> they've give up the deterministic behavior we rely on quite
MM> heavily for debugging. If event A happens before event B, we must
MM> see the message from A before the one from B, even if B happens in
MM> irq context.

MM> And if event B is a hard lock up, we'd also like to be sure the
MM> message for A actually gets out. If B happens in the interrupt
MM> that comes in when we re-enable them, that won't happen.

I can see the concerns, but right now it all leads to disabling serial
console for real-time servers. That is even less helpful for
debugging.

/Benny

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/