linux-kernel - RE: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	David Schwartz <davids@...master.com>
cc:	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: RE: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, David Schwartz wrote:

> 	I don't see how that can be. Suppose I add fd 8 to an epoll set. Suppose fd
> 5 is a dup of fd 8. Now, I close fd 8. How can fd 8 remain in my epoll set,
> since there no longer is an fd 8? Events on files registered for epoll
> notification are reported by descriptor, so the set membership has to be
> associated (as reflected into userspace) with the descriptor, not the file.

Eric already answered to your question (epoll deals with internal kernel 
objects - aka file*).
I just want to answer this one for another reason. WTF is wrong with all 
of you Cc-list-trimmers?
Could you *please* stop trimming Cc-lists?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/