linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100

> Subject		: Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not propagated. via sysctl too
> Submitter	: Serge van den Boom <svdb+linux-kernel-bugs@...ck.nl>
> References	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224
> Handled-By	: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>

I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has
existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it
doesn't belong on the regression list.

The bug reporter says something that drives me a little batty, which
is probably what got this onto the regression list.  He says "2.6.22
(not sure)" as the most recent kernel where the problem didn't occur.

People should list no version at all if they don't know, otherwise
we'll just get more bogons on the regression list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/