linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert x86: add lapic_shutdown for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:05:17 -0700
From:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	vgoyal@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hbabu@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert x86: add lapic_shutdown for x86_64

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:39:46 -0700
> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> 
>> lapic_shutdown is useless on x86_64.
>>
> 
> .... but since the goal is to get apic_32.c and apic_64.c to be more
> converging (to the point of becoming the same file)... isn't your patch
> going in the opposite direction?
> 
Hmm, I'm not sure that this revert affects x86 unification.
Vivek said that probably we don't have to introduce lapic_shutdown() for 64bit.
So I submitted this patch which reverts my previous post, it was applied before
the comment.

Thanks
Hiroshi Shimamoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/