linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:01:31 +0800
From:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	<hpa@...or.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <adaplas@....net>, <ak@...e.de>,
	<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

>From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
>On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800
>"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has
been
>> in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to
be
>> merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not
>> merged into mainline because the 32-bit boot protocol has not been
done.
>>
>> But now, the 32-bit boot protocol has been merged into mainline. So
can
>> this patchset be merged into mainline kernel now?
>>
>
>I stopped paying attention, sorry.  Have all the outstanding issues
been
>addressed?

That's all right. I think there is no big issue with this patchset, just
a framebuffer driver and the document.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/