linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 03 Nov 2007 22:17:41 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc

Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Balbir Singh writes:
> 
>> So, scaled accounting will not be available if
>> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is defined? Am I reading this correctly
> 
> No, what makes you think that?  If VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y it is the
> responsibility of the arch's account_process_tick to update the scaled
> stats.  And the powerpc version does that by calling
> account_user_time_scaled().
> 
> Paul.

I looked at the diff's and could just see the reversal of scaled
accounting. I looked at account_process_vtime(), now
account_process_tick() and things seem fine. I was mislead by the
diff.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/