linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2007 19:26:33 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache

n Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Every anonymous, tmpfs or shared memory segment page is potentially
> swap backed. That is the whole point of the PG_swapbacked flag.

One of the current issues with anonymous pages is the accounting when 
they become file backed and get dirty. There are performance issue with 
swap writeout because we are not doing it in file order and on a page by 
page basis.

Do ramfs pages count as memory backed?
 
> A page from a filesystem like ext3 or NFS cannot suddenly turn into
> a swap backed page.  This page "nature" is not changed during the
> lifetime of a page.

Well COW sortof does that but then its a new page.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/