linux-kernel - Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:26:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	peterz@...radead.org
Cc:	clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:19:08 +0100

> 
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:31 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't like those shouting macros.
> > 
> > The convention for macros is to use upper case.
> 
> We have plent macros that look like regular functions. And as a primary
> interface to this functionality these shouting things look really out of
> place.

I disagree, macros in upper case make sense here.  Macros should SHOUT
at you because CPP is MAGIC and has side effects that normal real
functions do not have, and therefore you need to be REMINDED.

And, honestly, aren't there more important issues about his patches to
review than macro capitalization?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/