linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/11 v3] enable "make ARCH=x86"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:23:23 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 v3] enable "make ARCH=x86"

Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> This is the patch that get rid of ARCH=i386 and ARCH=x86_64
> and introduce ARCH=x86.
> It touches several files but the changes are all one or two-liners.
> 
>       x86: drop backward compatibility symlinks to i386/boot and x86_64/boot
>       kbuild: sanity check the specified arch


IMO it negatives impacts the workflow when you -remove- the ability to 
set 32/64-bit on the make command line.

Building and testing for both architectures now requires the additional 
step of editing .config, which is a clear workflow negative impact at 
least for me.

I switch between other cross-compiled arches (alpha, usually) on the 
makefile command line

Yes, I know other 32/64-bit arches require .config editing.  That 
doesn't change the basic fact that this is a workflow regression.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/