[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:30:49 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: use $K64BIT to set 64BIT with all*config targets
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
> > I'm wondering why you don't use two different O= output directories
> > instead?
> >
> > Depending on the CONFIG_ option in question this might even greatly
> > reduce your compile times.
>
> /me is filled with wonder at the discovery that .config is saved in the O=
> directory. Thanks a lot Adrian for this time saver. So it's not strictly an
> output directory, more a build directory.
The opposite....
All output is placed there - including the configuration generated by
the *config frontends.
It is not limited to kernel-build output.
One of the use cases for "make O=.." is a setup where the kernel source
is located in a RO location (CDROM, restricted permissions etc).
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists