linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:46:39 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	clameter@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	penberg@...helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu
 access overhead

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:18:17 +0100

> Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> For example, I do think using a per cpu memory storage on net_device refcnt &
> >> last_rx could give us some speedups.
> > 
> > Note that there was a new patchset posted (titled cpu alloc v1) that 
> > provides on demand extension of the cpu areas.
> > 
> > See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119438261304093&w=2
> 
> Thank you Christoph. I was traveling last week so I missed that.
> 
> This new patchset looks very interesting, you did a fantastic job !

Yes I like it too.  It's in my backlog of things to test on
sparc64.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/