lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:59:34 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> Subject: Re: x86_64: Make sparsemem/vmemmap the default memory model On Tuesday 13 November 2007 00:52:14 Christoph Lameter wrote: > Use sparsemem as the only memory model for UP, SMP and NUMA. > > Measurements indicate that DISCONTIGMEM has a higher > overhead than sparsemem. And FLATMEMs benefits are minimal. So I think its > best to simply standardize on sparsemem. How about the memory overhead? Is it the same too? And code size vs flatmem? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists