lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:08:35 +0800 From: "Peter Teoh" <htmldeveloper@...il.com> To: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> Cc: "Jan Glauber" <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Pavel Emelyanov" <xemul@...nvz.org>, "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, "Jon Masters" <jonathan@...masters.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] module loader should not complain about unknown symbol On Nov 13, 2007 10:52 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 09:23:12 Rusty Russell wrote: > > Better might be to put in a waitqueue and wake it up whenever a module is > > deleted or changes status. Then use_module() can wait if > > strong_try_module_get() returns -EBUSY (up to 30 seconds, then print a > > warning and fail). > Will it ever go into a deadlock (or likewise DOS scenario) if modA dep on modB, but modB also dep on modA? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists