linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/18] x86 vDSO: consolidate vdso32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:32:09 -0800 (PST)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] x86 vDSO: consolidate vdso32

For 64-bit, the hack consists of a switch that chooses whether to use a
fixed address or a generically-assigned one, that's all there is to it.
So it costs about nothing.

Even for 32-bit, CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO for a while now is doing nothing but
changing the default of the sysctl variable.  There the fixmap part is some
extra stuff that could go away in the ideal in the fullness of time.  But
it doesn't hurt to keep it, especially when never turned on.

The upshot of my changes is that whatever the choices available for the
layout of 32-bit address spaces, they should match on 32-bit and 64-bit kernels.
If you want to reduce that set of choices in both, that is a separate issue.

Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/