[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:00:58 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
> > a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
> > has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
> > which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer()
> > This patch uses __builtin_const_p() to omit needless memory barriers
> > for NULL-pointer assignments at compile time with no runtime penalty,
> > as discussed in the following thread:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@...r.kernel.org/msg54852.html
> >
> > Tested on x86_64 and ppc64, also compiled the four cases (NULL/non-NULL
> > and const/non-const) with gcc version 4.1.2, and hand-checked the
> > assembly output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>
> Thanks a lot for following through with this Paul!
No problem -- after all, it is not every day that one gets the opportunity
to make a simple change that speeds things up and makes kernel hackers
lives a bit simpler. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hosted by DataForce ISP -
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux