linux-kernel - Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:59:16 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Radoslaw Szkodzinski <lkml@...ralstorm.puszkin.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks


* Radoslaw Szkodzinski <lkml@...ralstorm.puszkin.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:29:56 +0100
> > * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > feedback about an impending catastrophy has been duly noted
> > > 
> > > The point was less about an impending catastrophe, but more of a 
> > > timebomb ticking until the next widely used release.
> 
> I think I know why Andi is so much against backtraces: he has some log 
> filter listening on netconsole mailing him with suspicious log 
> messages.

Andi, is that true? If yes, why didnt Andi state this concern outright, 
instead of pooh-pooh-ing the patch on various other grounds?

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/