linux-kernel - Re: Fedora's latest gcc produces unbootable kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:03:28 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@....tglx.de>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fedora's latest gcc produces unbootable kernels

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Of course just to annoy you :)
> 
> It doesn't matter whether I'm annoyed about this or not, but whether gcc is
> able to generate decent code with it or not.  And especially with union it
> is not, at least through all the tree ssa passes.  You already have a lot of
> the details hidden in ktime.h accessor inlines, so I don't think it would be
> hard to add further one or two.
> 
> Anyway, even just using typedef struct ktime { s64 tv64; } ktime_t; could
> make things better in case you have just one field.  Unlike unions, structs
> can be (and in this case most likely will be) scalarized by SRA, so
> half of tree SSA passes will see it as integral var and will be able to
> perform optimizations on it.

Makes sense. I look into fixing that.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/